Comments for Social Science Space http://www.socialsciencespace.com A space to explore, share and shape the issues facing social scientists Sun, 09 Aug 2015 23:24:52 +0000 hourly 1 Comment on Too Much Crime Fiction at the Election: Politicians Warned Over Misleading manifesto Claims by james http://www.socialsciencespace.com/2015/04/too-much-crime-fiction-at-the-election-politicians-warned-over-misleading-manifesto-claims/#comment-2918214 Sun, 09 Aug 2015 23:24:52 +0000 http://www.socialsciencespace.com/?p=17172#comment-2918214 It does’nt matter what country or what political party is involved, All politicians eventually consider only one thing…re-election. It does’nt matter what their original motivation was, re-election will become their “God”…all else is secondary.

james

]]>
Comment on AllTrials Opens Curtains on Clinical Trials by Adam Jacobs http://www.socialsciencespace.com/2015/08/alltrials-pulls-the-veil-from-clinical-trials/#comment-2911837 Fri, 07 Aug 2015 17:56:01 +0000 http://www.socialsciencespace.com/?p=17898#comment-2911837 “Unfortunately, we now know that around half of all clinical trials, on the treatments we use today, are withheld from doctors, researchers, and patients”

No, we don’t know that at all. That’s a nice soundbite, but I’m afraid it’s not remotely evidence based.

It’s possible that back in the bad old days in the last century only about half of trials were published. But that’s changed very much in recent years, and recent estimates tend to show about 80-90% of trials are disclosed.

What’s the figure for the overall %, including old trials and more recent ones? No idea. No-one has ever calculated it.

]]>
Comment on How Few Papers Ever Get Cited? It’s Bad, But Not THAT Bad by Robert Matthews http://www.socialsciencespace.com/2014/04/how-few-papers-ever-get-cited-its-bad-but-not-that-bad/#comment-2911394 Fri, 07 Aug 2015 12:37:12 +0000 http://www.socialsciencespace.com/?p=12651#comment-2911394 Really appreciated this debunking effort. Always fascinating to see how a myth gets started, and to have someone dig out the references. Thanks !

]]>
Comment on Close Encounters of the Dental Kind by Robert Dingwall http://www.socialsciencespace.com/2015/06/close-encounters-of-the-dental-kind/#comment-2909134 Thu, 06 Aug 2015 14:14:34 +0000 http://www.socialsciencespace.com/?p=17556#comment-2909134 Actually I disposed of them into the sewer system because the pharmacy was closed and I was leaving town. Seemed safer than adding them to the tip for the maid. Not as bad as using this route for antibiotics

]]>
Comment on Too Much Crime Fiction at the Election: Politicians Warned Over Misleading manifesto Claims by james http://www.socialsciencespace.com/2015/04/too-much-crime-fiction-at-the-election-politicians-warned-over-misleading-manifesto-claims/#comment-2905750 Wed, 05 Aug 2015 01:16:05 +0000 http://www.socialsciencespace.com/?p=17172#comment-2905750 Politics means self interest. Period.

james

]]>
Comment on About Social Science Bites by 听觉动物的福利: 15个你一定爱听的社科思想类播客 - 网贷导航-金融界最爱看的网贷导航-最专业的网贷导航-wddh.org http://www.socialsciencespace.com/about-socialsciencebites/#comment-2900520 Mon, 03 Aug 2015 00:51:59 +0000 http://www.socialsciencespace.com/#comment-2900520 […] 11. Social Science Bites http://www.socialsciencespace.com/about-socialsciencebites/ […]

]]>
Comment on Peter Ghosh on Max Weber and ‘The Protestant Ethic’ by 听觉动物的福利: 15个你一定爱听的社科思想类播客 - 网贷导航-金融界最爱看的网贷导航-最专业的网贷导航-wddh.org http://www.socialsciencespace.com/2014/12/peter-ghosh-on-max-weber-and-the-protestant-ethic/#comment-2900519 Mon, 03 Aug 2015 00:51:59 +0000 http://www.socialsciencespace.com/?p=16046#comment-2900519 […] 牛津历史学者 Peter Ghosh 解读马克思韦伯经典作品《新教伦理与资本主义精神》 http://www.socialsciencespace.com/2014/12/peter-ghosh-on-max-weber-and-the-protestant-ethic/ […]

]]>
Comment on How Does False Information Spread Online? by New Media and the Importance of Credibility | New Media Who? http://www.socialsciencespace.com/2014/04/how-does-false-information-spread-online/#comment-2896068 Fri, 31 Jul 2015 15:56:02 +0000 http://www.socialsciencespace.com/?p=12472#comment-2896068 […] Vis, F. (2014). How Does False Information Spread Online? Retrieved July 31, 2015, from http://www.socialsciencespace.com/2014/04/how-does-false-information-spread-online/ […]

]]>
Comment on Steven Pinker on Violence and Human Nature by Andy Rhodes http://www.socialsciencespace.com/2012/11/podcast-steven-pinker-on-violence-and-human-nature/#comment-2895247 Fri, 31 Jul 2015 05:13:17 +0000 http://www.socialsciencespace.com/?p=6708#comment-2895247 I’m a huge fan of this book.

I’ve been in a weekly book group for six years and after one year of my salesmanship and heartfelt convincing they agreed to read Pinker’s exploration of the decline of violence. I’ve debated the contents for the past three years in person and online with liberals and conservatives. They have knee-jerk criticisms that they tend to maintain no matter how much data one puts forward. Of course, Pinker writes about a lot more than the data in his book. He has many theories and analyses that one can challenge. Many academically oriented people in my group did. My point is try and make sure lots more people are exposed to the overall fact that violence has declined. Then, we can listen to Pinker and others who may help us understand or formulate our own theories as to why this happened and what might be done to continue and even improve the trend.

I’ve included a few dozen nice color charts related to the text here:

https://persuademepolitics.wordpress.com/2015/07/30/now-most-peaceful-time-in-world-history/

More can be found through an image search for “steven pinker better angels charts”.

Through my many discussions on “Better Angels”, I’ve developed and revised multiple times an overview statement for the book along with attaching or copying many charts that Pinker put together. Here is my latest version:

——————————————————————–

Much of the information below comes from Steven Pinker’s book, “The Better Angels of Our Nature: Why Violence Has Declined”. This remarkable text evaluates and combines the work of dozens of historians to show that, contrary to popular opinion on the left and right, the planet has become far more peaceful than in any other time in history. Terrible things like warfare, rape, murder, legal and illegal slavery, bullying, lynchings, racism, sexism and animal abuse are all in radical decline. This process started when societies began to organize away from hunter-gatherer communities between 7,000-10,000 years ago into structured civilizations, but shifted to an accelerated level of reform during the 18th century’s Age of Enlightenment and afterward. By absolute numbers and percentage of population, the trend is downward in violent behavior.

Whether intentionally or not, the media often makes the global situation look like everything is getting worse or at least not significantly improving. That’s just not the case when it comes to acts of violence. There still is plenty of harm being done by humans to one another, but thankfully it’s far less prevalent overall than in 1965 or 1805 or 1585. Through a very large range of historical narratives, archaeology and statistics, the human condition generally reveals itself as more barbarous the further backward one looks. On a recent note, the U.S. crime rate now is half of what it was in the early 1990s. This includes places known to be more dangerous like Baltimore, Washington D.C, New Orleans, Detroit, Chicago and Philadelphia. Between 1973 and 2008, rape decreased by 80% and murder became 40% less common. According to the FBI, from 2001-2010, the crime rates went down in categories of violent crime (20%), forcible rape (13.8%), robbery (19.7%), aggravated assault (20.8%) and motor vehicle theft (44.5%).

When using percentage of population as a guide to study the scale of war related deaths, the worst atrocities of the 20th century don’t top the historical list. Just 4 horrific events of the 1900s make it into the top 20. Only 1 makes the top 10, as WWII ranks 9th. Archaeological evidence from almost 40 pre-state societies of eras as far back as 14,000 years ago and up to those active today show an average of a 15% violent death rate because of trauma evidence in the skeletal remains. The Middle Ages hovered under 10% and gradually lessened. The 20th century, even with all of its devastation and human suffering, had a rate of a much smaller 3%. The 21st century is astronomically low in comparison, 0.03%. That’s 500 times less than typical pre-state levels of brutality. Contrast modern levels of carnage to that of the American Wild West, where the percentages ranged up to 30% or higher in each town. England, for another example, now has a murder rate that is 35 times less than in the Middle Ages.

The Wikipedia page about this book summarizes the proposed causes for the decline in violence:
——————————————–

Pinker identifies five “historical forces” that have favored “our peaceable motives” and “have driven the multiple declines in violence.” They are:

The Leviathan – The rise of the modern nation-state and judiciary “with a monopoly on the legitimate use of force,” which “can defuse the [individual] temptation of exploitative attack, inhibit the impulse for revenge, and circumvent…self-serving biases.”

Commerce – The rise of “technological progress [allowing] the exchange of goods and services over longer distances and larger groups of trading partners,” so that “other people become more valuable alive than dead” and “are less likely to become targets of demonization and dehumanization”;

Feminization – Increasing respect for “the interests and values of women.”

Cosmopolitanism – the rise of forces such as literacy, mobility, and mass media, which“can prompt people to take the perspectives of people unlike themselves and to expand their circle of sympathy to embrace them”;

The Escalator of Reason – an “intensifying application of knowledge and rationality to human affairs,” which “can force people to recognize the futility of cycles of violence, to ramp down the privileging of their own interests over others’s, and to reframe violence as a problem to be solved rather than a contest to be won.”

From – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Better_Angels_of_Our_Nature
——————————————–

For an interesting video presentation/summary of the contents of this book, see this link:

A great web site that can be used as a reference to double-check this data is necrometrics.com, where typically a half dozen or more historians contribute their estimate on the death toll for each significant historical event. As far as I have been able to study, Pinker many (if not most) times chose one of the conservative numbers in the ranges.

]]>
Comment on How Does False Information Spread Online? by 3.1 Sources, Credibility, and Social Media – Daphne Nichols | octothorpemedia http://www.socialsciencespace.com/2014/04/how-does-false-information-spread-online/#comment-2894932 Fri, 31 Jul 2015 01:16:36 +0000 http://www.socialsciencespace.com/?p=12472#comment-2894932 […] Vis, F. (2014, April 16). How does false information spread online? Retrieved from http://www.socialsciencespace.com/2014/04/how-does-false-information-spread-online/ […]

]]>