Comments for AurĂ©lien Jarno http://blog.aurel32.net Thu, 21 Aug 2014 10:30:32 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1 Comment on MIPS Creator CI20 by gwhaley http://blog.aurel32.net/325#comment-4303 Thu, 21 Aug 2014 10:30:32 +0000 http://blog.aurel32.net/?p=325#comment-4303 Or the EdgeRouter 8pro, which is dual-core 1GHz OcteonII, with SODIMM (can be upgraded to 8Gbytes), and can be booted in either endian! (the little endian patches are in preparation for upstreaming…) It does cost more than the EdgeRouter3/Lite though.
If you are doing ‘tiny’ stuff then maybe check out boards like carambola2 or VoCore which are big endian 32bit but do not have the capacity (I believe – RAM or flash etc.) to run Debian. OK for OpenWRT though etc.

Board is announced and ‘request a board’ page is now active on imgtec.com – you can find a link from the elinux.org CI20 pages. Currently you can ‘only’ get them for free though (if you have a project etc.) – not yet for purchase…

]]>
Comment on MIPS Creator CI20 by aurel32 http://blog.aurel32.net/325#comment-4302 Thu, 21 Aug 2014 09:22:15 +0000 http://blog.aurel32.net/?p=325#comment-4302 It’s not a development board, but you might want to have a look at the EdgeRouter Lite. It comes with 512MB RAM and a dual-core Octeon CPU (MIPS64R2).

]]>
Comment on MIPS Creator CI20 by Jo Shields http://blog.aurel32.net/325#comment-4301 Thu, 21 Aug 2014 08:23:57 +0000 http://blog.aurel32.net/?p=325#comment-4301 So what’s the closest thing to a comparable big-endian dev board these days?

]]>
Comment on Intel about to disable TSX instructions? by AngryProc http://blog.aurel32.net/299#comment-4288 Sat, 16 Aug 2014 09:22:46 +0000 http://blog.aurel32.net/?p=299#comment-4288 I’m so frustrated by the way Intel is handling this. TSX was a selling-point, so it’s not acceptable to simply disable the functionality. The way that mainstream media is either completely ignoring the issue or trying to diffuse it by calling it a “seldom-used” feature is repugnant.

]]>
Comment on Intel about to disable TSX instructions? by Christian http://blog.aurel32.net/299#comment-4287 Sat, 16 Aug 2014 08:30:51 +0000 http://blog.aurel32.net/?p=299#comment-4287 I would expect them to recall the affected models, similar to the FDIV bug. TSX support was one of the major selling points of Haswell.

]]>
Comment on Debian is switching (back) to GLIBC by Opencast Alpha n.47 | Gruppo Linux Como http://blog.aurel32.net/175#comment-3956 Tue, 15 Jul 2014 08:34:45 +0000 http://blog.aurel32.net/?p=175#comment-3956 […] Debian torna a GLIBC […]

]]>
Comment on Debian is switching (back) to GLIBC by Spotify 0.9.11 and GLIBC in Linux Debian Wheezy | captivus curiositatis http://blog.aurel32.net/175#comment-3849 Thu, 10 Jul 2014 18:15:02 +0000 http://blog.aurel32.net/?p=175#comment-3849 […] http://blog.aurel32.net/175 17: […]

]]>
Comment on Debian is switching (back) to GLIBC by Go back to GLIBC | linuxcooltools http://blog.aurel32.net/175#comment-3360 Wed, 02 Jul 2014 07:36:28 +0000 http://blog.aurel32.net/?p=175#comment-3360 […] continue to post […]

]]>
Comment on Debian is switching to EGLIBC by Go back to GLIBC | linuxcooltools http://blog.aurel32.net/47#comment-3359 Wed, 02 Jul 2014 07:33:19 +0000 http://blog.aurel32.net/?p=47#comment-3359 […] years ago Debian and most derivatives switched from the standard GNU C Library (GLIBC) to the Embedded GLIBC (EGLIBC). Debian is now about to take […]

]]>
Comment on Debian is switching (back) to GLIBC by Albert http://blog.aurel32.net/175#comment-3178 Thu, 26 Jun 2014 02:32:08 +0000 http://blog.aurel32.net/?p=175#comment-3178 gets actually, not fgets

]]>