Comments on: A Response to ‘OER and the Future of Publishing’ http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/3462 pragmatism over zeal - aut inveniam viam aut faciam Wed, 05 Aug 2015 22:52:00 +0000 hourly 1 By: A Response to “OER Beyond Voluntarism” http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/3462/comment-page-1#comment-50454 Fri, 29 Aug 2014 15:41:18 +0000 http://opencontent.org/blog/?p=3462#comment-50454 […] responded by explaining that the emergence of companies like Red Hat for OER would indeed make it happen, […]

]]>
By: Don Gorges http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/3462/comment-page-1#comment-50452 Wed, 20 Aug 2014 19:25:00 +0000 http://opencontent.org/blog/?p=3462#comment-50452 __Noted in Pearson’s Math Efficacy Report, the cost-related issues cited most often are decreased Institutional costs and Faculty Department Instructional costs _ http://www.pearsonmylabandmastering.com/northamerica/results/files/MTGV6_July16_RL.pdf _

]]>
By: Green Shift http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/3462/comment-page-1#comment-50451 Wed, 20 Aug 2014 16:22:00 +0000 http://opencontent.org/blog/?p=3462#comment-50451 Coming in with a different approach, reading books through internet much cheaper, cost saving and environmental friendly. The question is, how can a child around the world in ZIMBABWE, Rwanda, Madagascar, Kinshasa,
Angola, Monrovia, Ghana and Kenya etc… use the same books to read and do
research so that they grow in knowledge?

]]>
By: John Mayer http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/3462/comment-page-1#comment-50450 Tue, 19 Aug 2014 22:27:00 +0000 http://opencontent.org/blog/?p=3462#comment-50450 “..You can start enabling reform of teaching approaches by building off open texts…”

Exactly right. This is what we are doing in the legal education space. CALI pays law faculty to write textbooks/casebooks and publishes them under CC-BY license so that faculty AND students can take the materials and do what they want (remix, re-use) for their own learning environment. This is sustainably accomplished by annual dues from law schools and over 95% of them are members of CALI. See http://www.cali.org/the-elangdell-bookstore for our bookstore. Lowering the price for students is a side-effect, but not the primary goal. Better education is our goal.

]]>
By: Don Gorges http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/3462/comment-page-1#comment-50448 Tue, 19 Aug 2014 14:28:00 +0000 http://opencontent.org/blog/?p=3462#comment-50448 __Let’s also see Class Flipping, the other variable, factored into this case study to be able to distinguish between the OER Impact Factor and the changes to pedagogy _ Let’s also see pass rates in all semesters since changes made.

]]>
By: OER and the Future of Knewton |e-Literate http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/3462/comment-page-1#comment-50446 Mon, 18 Aug 2014 18:56:34 +0000 http://opencontent.org/blog/?p=3462#comment-50446 […] it has low production values, no instructional design, and is not enterprise grade. Unsurprisingly, David Wiley disagrees. I also disagree, but for somewhat different reasons than […]

]]>
By: hapgood http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/3462/comment-page-1#comment-50445 Mon, 18 Aug 2014 17:55:00 +0000 http://opencontent.org/blog/?p=3462#comment-50445 The other thing that Jose really missed was the fact that texts are not an island. I know in this initial phase it’s mostly a swap-out — there’s not much customization going on.

But once that swap-out is complete, it’s interesting to imagine the flexibility of a school running on OER versus one running on publisher texts. You can start enabling reform of teaching approaches by building off open texts. You can start to build common learning spaces based on those texts.

We’re early in this — it’s mostly cost and small to moderate gains. It will be that for a while. But I think ultimately breaking free of commercial textbooks will have a much larger impact on other parts of teaching than we can currently imagine.

All things being equal, when materials make it easier to do one thing than another, that thing will be done more. Textbooks have enabled the silly way we teach for too long; having control of them allows us to make good pedagogy easier, something textbook companies have only loosely committed to.

]]>